Hi, can you please rewrite this and make it have more information?
Hi, can you please rewrite this and make it have more information? with different references and use the information from this worksheet to write it more clearly and with full sentences. i also attached a file of a student example of what this nursing process worksheet needs to look like. the patient that you will be rewritting for is the JV patient that has type 2 diabetes.
NURS 121L-A – Nursing Process Worksheet
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeChief Complaint and Admitting Diagnosis, Pathophysiology of Admitting Diagnosis
1 pts
Proficient
Chief complaint and admitting diagnosis present. Complete, detailed pathophysiology of admitting diagnosis. Must include risk factors, signs and symptoms, and complications. Supported with evidence-based citation(s). Must relate pathophysiology section back to the patient.
0.85 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Chief complaint and admitting diagnosis present. Nearly complete pathophysiology of admitting diagnosis. Must include risk factors, signs and symptoms, and complications. Supported with evidence-based citation(s). Must relate pathophysiology section back to the patient.
0.7 pts
Developing
Chief complaint and admitting diagnosis present. Partially complete pathophysiology of admitting diagnosis. Missing risk factors, signs and symptoms, and/or complications. Supported with evidence-based citation(s). Must relate pathophysiology section back to the patient.
0 pts
Underdeveloped
No chief complaint and/or admitting diagnosis present. No pathophysiology of admitting diagnosis. Does not include risk factors, signs and symptoms, and complications. Not supported with evidence-based citation(s). Does not relate pathophysiology section back to the patient.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Assessment Cues
1 pts
Proficient
Identifies 3 priority assessment cues and explains why each cue is abnormal in relation to the patient and admitting diagnosis. All explanations supported with evidence-based citation(s).
0.85 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Identifies 2 priority assessment cues and explains why each cue is abnormal in relation to the patient and admitting diagnosis. All explanations supported with evidence-based citation(s).
0.7 pts
Developing
Identifies 1 priority assessment cues and explains why each cue is abnormal in relation to the patient and admitting diagnosis. All explanations supported with evidence-based citation(s).
0 pts
Underdeveloped
Unable to identify any priority assessment cues in relation to the patient and admitting diagnosis. Not supported with evidence-based citation(s).
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrioritize Hypotheses
1 pts
Proficient
Uses the most priority problem for the patient in relation to their admitting diagnosis and abnormal cues. (Maslow, Nursing Process, ABCs, Safety and Risk reduction, Least restrictive/lease invasive, survival, acute v chronic; unstable v stable, urgent v non-urgent).
0.85 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Uses the second priority problem for the patient in relation to their admitting diagnosis and abnormal cues. (Maslow, Nursing Process, ABCs, Safety and Risk reduction, Least restrictive/lease invasive, survival, acute v chronic; unstable v stable, urgent v non-urgent).
0.7 pts
Developing
Uses the third priority problem for the patient in relation to their admitting diagnosis and abnormal cues. (Maslow, Nursing Process, ABCs, Safety and Risk reduction, Least restrictive/lease invasive, survival, acute v chronic; unstable v stable, urgent v non-urgent).
0 pts
Underdeveloped
Does not use any priority problem for the patient in relation to their admitting diagnosis and abnormal cues.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlanning: SMART Goal
1 pts
Proficient
Provides 1 goal for the identified priority problem. Must include: goal is specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time-stamped.
0.85 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Provides 1 goal for the identified priority problem BUT goal is not specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, or time-stamped.
0.7 pts
Developing
Provides 1 goal but is not related to the identified problem. Goal is not specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, or time-stamped.
0 pts
Underdeveloped
Does not provide any goal; not related to the identified problem.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplementation
1 pts
Proficient
For the identified priority problem, student provides 4 independent interventions (1 must be a teaching intervention). Each intervention is supported with scientific rationale using textbook or evidence-based citations.
0.85 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
For the identified priority problem, student provides 3 independent interventions (1 must be a teaching intervention). Each intervention is supported with scientific rationale using textbook or evidence-based citations.
0.7 pts
Developing
For the identified priority problem, student provides 2 independent interventions OR did not include a teaching intervention. Each intervention is supported with scientific rationale using textbook or evidence-based citations.
0 pts
Underdeveloped
Did not provide independent interventions related back to the identified priority problem OR 1/more interventions not supported with scientific rationale using textbook or evidence-based citations.
1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation
0.5 pts
Proficient
Clearly and accurately documents whether goal was met, not met, or partially met. Includes appropriate revision statements using SMART criteria for goals that were not met or partially met. Includes appropriate recommendations.
0.35 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Clearly and accurately documents whether goal was met, not met, or partially met. Revision for goals not met/partially met are included, but missing 1/more SMART criteria in revision statement. Includes appropriate recommendations.
0.15 pts
Developing
Clearly and accurately documents whether goal was met, not met, or partially met. Revision for goals not met/partially met are included, but missing all SMART criteria in revision statement. Includes appropriate recommendations.
0 pts
Underdeveloped
Does not document whether goal was met, not met, or partially met OR does not include appropriate revisions for goals that were not met or partially met. Does not include appropriate recommendations.
0.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNursing Application Assessment and Student Journal
0.5 pts
Proficient
For all 3 categories, student includes 1 activity. Activity listed is related to the category and to the patient. Student journal completed in its entirety including: personal goals for the day, experience (specialty areas) and activities for the day, thoughts about your experience today (how did you meet your goal?), and your feelings for today (how can you utilize your experience in the future?).
0.35 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Includes 1 activity in only 2 categories. Activity listed is related to the category and to the patient. Student journal completed in its entirety including: personal goals for the day, experience (specialty areas) and activities for the day, thoughts about your experience today (how did you meet your goal?), and your feelings for today (how can you utilize your experience in the future?).
0.15 pts
Developing
Includes 1 activity in only 1 category. Activity listed is related to the category and to the patient. Student journal completed in its entirety including: personal goals for the day, experience (specialty areas) and activities for the day, thoughts about your experience today (how did you meet your goal?), and your feelings for today (how can you utilize your experience in the future?).
0 pts
Underdeveloped
Missing all 3 categories OR activity listed is not related to the category and to the patient OR student journal not completed in its entirety including: personal goals for the day, experience (specialty areas) and activities for the day, thoughts about your experience today (how did you meet your goal?), and your feelings for today (how can you utilize your experience in the future?).
0.5 pts
3 attachments
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
