I need one ppt with at least 30 pages for 6 people to deliver the speech and write the corresponding speech draft at least 3000 words :
I need one ppt with at least 30 pages for 6 people to deliver the speech and write the corresponding speech draft at least 3000 words : Select a market from the list of emerging markets provided by Global Edge and apply the learning gained from all workshops, with a particular emphasis on the following:
1. Evaluate the suitability of the selected market from multiple perspectives (market attractiveness/potential for certain industries, operational convenience, political risk and corruption factors, operational/logistics considerations, unique negotiation style of the selected market, and conflict management aspects).
Based on the above evaluation, provide specific recommendations for certain industries/products/services.
Preparing for your assignment.
Refer to the Module Information Pack to understand the Learning Outcomes, and see the Submissions Details Section and Marking Criteria Below
Teaching into assessment
All workshop material covered from week 1 up to week 14 is relevant to help you produce and edit your presentation.
We will hold dedicated sessions during the semester in which you are given the opportunity to work on, discuss and incrementally build your presentation materials within the classroom. This will be a forum to discuss relevant sources and materials for the presentation.
Please refer to Blackboard to access module’s materials.
Assessment Pack Contents:
THE BRIEF/INSTRUCTIONS – SUBMISSION DETAILS
Choose a market from the list of Emerging Markets available through Global Edge and apply the learning acquired throughout all workshops with a specific emphasis on the following:
The presentation will be completed:
Presentation must be:
Choices need to be made by the 19th of February 2024, to allow for organisation of the pairs or groups.
This assessment is worth 50% of the overall module grade.
Marking criteria for this assessment and weightings are provided below.
Assessing the suitability of the chosen market from multiple angles (market attractiveness/potential to certain industries, ease of doing business, political risk and corruption factors, considerations for operations/logistics, negotiation styles and conflict management aspects unique to the chosen market).
Making specific recommendations for certain industries/products/services based on the above assessment.
It should be 30 minutes long for the speech.
Please see full marking criteria below.
Please do not overcrowd the slides with too much information
Please use visuals
Harvard Referencing Style – https://www.citethemrightonline.com/Basic
Assessment Criteria
Marking Criteria for the Assignment
Grade
%
Descriptive terms associated with students’ performance across a level
Knowledge / Understanding (30%)
Argument / Evaluation /
Application (30%)
Research /
Evidence/ Interpretation (30%)
Presentation / Structure / Referencing (10%)
What are we looking for in each column?
What do you know and understand?
What do you do with this?
How do you evidence/support this?
How do you communicate this?
86-100
Exemplary, outstanding, creative, insightful, illuminating, inspiring, authoritative, professional, exceeding expectations
Submission demonstrates an outstanding understanding of a key/core contemporary theories, some of which at the current boundaries of an academic discipline
An outstanding ability to critically evaluate ideas, challenge assumptions and devise and sustain arguments
Authoritative use of established techniques of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources appropriate to the discipline
Information professionally presented, structured and communicated (to relevant/specialist audience); references accurate, reliable and precise
70-85
Excellent, persuasive, sophisticated, original, ambitious, meticulous, critical, innovative
Submission demonstrates an excellent understanding of a key/core contemporary theories, some of which at the current boundaries of an academic discipline
An excellent ability to critically evaluate ideas, challenge assumptions and devise and sustain arguments
Persuasive use of established techniques of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources appropriate to the discipline
Information excellently presented, structured and communicated (to relevant/specialist audience); references accurate, reliable and precise
60-69
Very good, fluent, thorough, analytical, precise, rigorous, sustained, convincing
Submission demonstrates a very good understanding of a key/core contemporary theories, some of which are at the forefront of the discipline
A very good ability to critically evaluate ideas, challenge assumptions and devise and sustain arguments
Convincing use of established techniques of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources appropriate to the discipline
Information precisely presented, structured and communicated (to relevant/specialist audience); references accurate and reliable
50-59
Good, reasonable, clear, confident, thoughtful, accurate, careful, congruent, coherent, solid, relevant, minor deficiencies
Submission demonstrates a good understanding of a key/core contemporary theories
A good ability to critically evaluate ideas, challenge assumptions and devise and sustain arguments
Confident use of established techniques of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources appropriate to the discipline
Information confidently/ clearly presented, structured and communicated (to relevant/specialist audience); references generally accurate with minor deficiencies
40-49
Satisfactory, sufficient, adequate, descriptive, partial, elementary, basic, mostly relevant, with deficiencies
Submission demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of a key/core contemporary theories
A basic ability to critically evaluate ideas, challenge assumptions and devise and sustain arguments
Adequate use of established techniques of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources appropriate to the discipline
Information satisfactorily presented, structured and communicated; references mostly accurate but some deficiencies
30-39
Incomplete, inadequate, inaccurate, inconsistent, contradictory, superficial, partially relevant, limited, below level
Submission demonstrates an incomplete understanding of key/core theories
Inadequate ability to critically evaluate ideas, challenge assumptions and devise and sustain arguments
Limited use of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources
Information inadequately presented, structured and communicated;; references inaccurate and inconsistent
15-29
Erroneous/wrong, missing, extremely limited, irrelevant, inappropriate, insufficient, unstructured, below expectations, not systematic, poor
Submission demonstrates an extremely limited understanding of key/ core theories
Insufficient evaluation; inability to develop a sustained argument
Poor use of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources
Work is unstructured; poorly presented and communicated; referencing erroneous/missing
0-14
Absent/none, lacking, formless, detrimental, incoherent, non-existent, deficient
Submission demonstrates an absence of understanding of key/ core theory
Lacking any form of evaluation and argument
A lack of analysis, and use scholarly reviews and primary sources non-existent
I need one ppt with at least 30 pages for 6 people to deliver the speech and write the corresponding speech draft at least 3000 words : Select a market from the list of emerging markets provided by Global Edge and apply the learning gained from all workshops, with a particular emphasis on the following:
1. Evaluate the suitability of the selected market from multiple perspectives (market attractiveness/potential for certain industries, operational convenience, political risk and corruption factors, operational/logistics considerations, unique negotiation style of the selected market, and conflict management aspects).
Based on the above evaluation, provide specific recommendations for certain industries/products/services.
Preparing for your assignment.
Refer to the Module Information Pack to understand the Learning Outcomes, and see the Submissions Details Section and Marking Criteria Below
Teaching into assessment
All workshop material covered from week 1 up to week 14 is relevant to help you produce and edit your presentation.
We will hold dedicated sessions during the semester in which you are given the opportunity to work on, discuss and incrementally build your presentation materials within the classroom. This will be a forum to discuss relevant sources and materials for the presentation.
Please refer to Blackboard to access module’s materials.
Assessment Pack Contents:
THE BRIEF/INSTRUCTIONS – SUBMISSION DETAILS
Choose a market from the list of Emerging Markets available through Global Edge and apply the learning acquired throughout all workshops with a specific emphasis on the following:
The presentation will be completed:
Presentation must be:
Choices need to be made by the 19th of February 2024, to allow for organisation of the pairs or groups.
This assessment is worth 50% of the overall module grade.
Marking criteria for this assessment and weightings are provided below.
Assessing the suitability of the chosen market from multiple angles (market attractiveness/potential to certain industries, ease of doing business, political risk and corruption factors, considerations for operations/logistics, negotiation styles and conflict management aspects unique to the chosen market).
Making specific recommendations for certain industries/products/services based on the above assessment.
It should be 30 minutes long for the speech.
Please see full marking criteria below.
Please do not overcrowd the slides with too much information
Please use visuals
Harvard Referencing Style – https://www.citethemrightonline.com/Basic
Assessment Criteria
Marking Criteria for the Assignment
Grade
%
Descriptive terms associated with students’ performance across a level
Knowledge / Understanding (30%)
Argument / Evaluation /
Application (30%)
Research /
Evidence/ Interpretation (30%)
Presentation / Structure / Referencing (10%)
What are we looking for in each column?
What do you know and understand?
What do you do with this?
How do you evidence/support this?
How do you communicate this?
86-100
Exemplary, outstanding, creative, insightful, illuminating, inspiring, authoritative, professional, exceeding expectations
Submission demonstrates an outstanding understanding of a key/core contemporary theories, some of which at the current boundaries of an academic discipline
An outstanding ability to critically evaluate ideas, challenge assumptions and devise and sustain arguments
Authoritative use of established techniques of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources appropriate to the discipline
Information professionally presented, structured and communicated (to relevant/specialist audience); references accurate, reliable and precise
70-85
Excellent, persuasive, sophisticated, original, ambitious, meticulous, critical, innovative
Submission demonstrates an excellent understanding of a key/core contemporary theories, some of which at the current boundaries of an academic discipline
An excellent ability to critically evaluate ideas, challenge assumptions and devise and sustain arguments
Persuasive use of established techniques of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources appropriate to the discipline
Information excellently presented, structured and communicated (to relevant/specialist audience); references accurate, reliable and precise
60-69
Very good, fluent, thorough, analytical, precise, rigorous, sustained, convincing
Submission demonstrates a very good understanding of a key/core contemporary theories, some of which are at the forefront of the discipline
A very good ability to critically evaluate ideas, challenge assumptions and devise and sustain arguments
Convincing use of established techniques of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources appropriate to the discipline
Information precisely presented, structured and communicated (to relevant/specialist audience); references accurate and reliable
50-59
Good, reasonable, clear, confident, thoughtful, accurate, careful, congruent, coherent, solid, relevant, minor deficiencies
Submission demonstrates a good understanding of a key/core contemporary theories
A good ability to critically evaluate ideas, challenge assumptions and devise and sustain arguments
Confident use of established techniques of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources appropriate to the discipline
Information confidently/ clearly presented, structured and communicated (to relevant/specialist audience); references generally accurate with minor deficiencies
40-49
Satisfactory, sufficient, adequate, descriptive, partial, elementary, basic, mostly relevant, with deficiencies
Submission demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of a key/core contemporary theories
A basic ability to critically evaluate ideas, challenge assumptions and devise and sustain arguments
Adequate use of established techniques of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources appropriate to the discipline
Information satisfactorily presented, structured and communicated; references mostly accurate but some deficiencies
30-39
Incomplete, inadequate, inaccurate, inconsistent, contradictory, superficial, partially relevant, limited, below level
Submission demonstrates an incomplete understanding of key/core theories
Inadequate ability to critically evaluate ideas, challenge assumptions and devise and sustain arguments
Limited use of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources
Information inadequately presented, structured and communicated;; references inaccurate and inconsistent
15-29
Erroneous/wrong, missing, extremely limited, irrelevant, inappropriate, insufficient, unstructured, below expectations, not systematic, poor
Submission demonstrates an extremely limited understanding of key/ core theories
Insufficient evaluation; inability to develop a sustained argument
Poor use of analysis, scholarly reviews and primary sources
Work is unstructured; poorly presented and communicated; referencing erroneous/missing
0-14
Absent/none, lacking, formless, detrimental, incoherent, non-existent, deficient
Submission demonstrates an absence of understanding of key/ core theory
Lacking any form of evaluation and argument
A lack of analysis, and use scholarly reviews and primary sources non-existent
Presentation and communication are careless and deficient; an absence of referencing
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.