Students will review their understanding of differential diagnosis and considerations for a plan of care in order to develop a voiceover PowerPoint presentation on the importance of intentional diagnostic testing.
Students will review their understanding of differential diagnosis and considerations for a plan of care in order to develop a voiceover PowerPoint presentation on the importance of intentional diagnostic testing. Students will address the following: (MUST INCLUDE SPEAKER NOTES)
what is a differential diagnosis list?
What must be considered when developing a differential diagnosis list?
Pick a medical condition that the provider might see in the acute care setting and describe the pathophysiology, risk factors, and signs and symptoms.
Discuss three differential diagnoses related to this condition.
Discuss why these differential diagnoses are appropriate for this condition.
Discuss similarities and differences between the three differential diagnoses and the medical condition described.
Discuss diagnostic criteria that the provider can use to help rule in or rule out these differentials.
Discuss the gold standard diagnostic test that must be used in order to rule in these differentials.
The presentation should be no longer than 15 minutes
You will also need to include graphics to make your slides interesting and engaging
You are to create bullet points for each slide, not including the title and reference slides. Include speaker notes for each slide by including 4-5 sentences to address the bulleted items on each slide. Follow current APA Style and include citations in your speaker notes
This is a voiceover presentation; please review the instructions on how to export the presentation with your narration
Include a minimum of 2 peer-reviewed research articles as references in the presentation. All research articles must be within the last 5 years
No blog, chat, other universities, or Wikipedia pages
Review the rubric to ensure you address all components of the assignment
NURS_697_DE – Week 4 Presentation
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverview of the differential diagnosis and what must be considered when developing the differential list.
15 to >12.82 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsExplains clearly and thoroughly the overview of the differential diagnosis list. 12.82 to >10.8 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsProvides partial overview of the differential diagnosis list. 10.8 to >8.5 ptsBelow ExpectationsProvides brief and incomplete understanding of the differential diagnosis list. 8.5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not provide brief/incomplete understanding of the differential diagnosis list.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverview of a medical condition the provider might see in the acute care setting.
15 to >10.68 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsPresents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of a medical condition seen in the acute care setting. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. 10.68 to >9.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsPresents an accurate analysis of the management of a medical condition seen in the acute care setting. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. 9 to >7.08 ptsBelow ExpectationsProvides insufficient explanations of the management of a medical condition seen in the acute care setting. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. 7.08 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations that show no understanding of current trend/issue. Information is not scientifically sound
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThree appropriate differential diagnoses related to the primary condition and why these are appropriate differentials.
15 to >10.68 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsPresents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of 3 differential diagnosis. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. 10.68 to >9.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsPresents an accurate analysis of 3 differential diagnosis. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. 9 to >7.08 ptsBelow ExpectationsProvides insufficient explanations of 3 differential diagnosis. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. 7.08 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations that show no understanding of current trend/issue. Information is not scientifically sound
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSimilarities and differences between the three differential diagnoses and the primary medical condition discussed.
15 to >10.68 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsPresents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of the similarities and differences between the differential list and the main condition. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic 10.68 to >9.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsPresents an accurate analysis of the similarities and differences between the differential list and the main condition. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. 9 to >7.08 ptsBelow ExpectationsProvides insufficient explanations of the similarities and differences between the differential list and the main condition. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. 7.08 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations that show no understanding of current trend/issue. Information is not scientifically sound
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiagnostic criteria the provider can use to rule in or rule out these differentials.
15 to >10.68 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsPresents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of the various diagnostic tests used to rule in/rule out the differential diagnosis. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. 10.68 to >9.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsPresents an accurate analysis of the various diagnostic tests used to rule in/rule out the differential diagnosis. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. 9 to >7.08 ptsBelow ExpectationsProvides insufficient explanations of the various diagnostic tests used to rule in/rule out the differential diagnosis. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. 7.08 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations that show no understanding of current trend/issue. Information is not scientifically sound
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
15 to >10.68 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsMakes insightful, clear, and accurate connections relating to proper documentation and the appropriate use of clinical notes. Offers detailed and specific examples regarding effect on current clinical practice settings. 10.68 to >9.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsMakes mostly accurate connections relating to proper documentation and the appropriate use of clinical notes, but may lack an important detail. Response indicates a general understanding regarding effect on current clinical practice settings. 9 to >7.08 ptsBelow ExpectationsProvides several insufficient or inaccurate connections relating to proper documentation and the appropriate use of clinical notes. Response indicates an introductory understanding regarding effect on current clinical practice settings. 7.08 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsInformation is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of current trend/issue and importance to lobby for any support funding.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication
5 to >3.56 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsProvides fully applications from clinical/personal to practice 3.56 to >3.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsProvides partially applications from clinical/personal to practice 3 to >2.36 ptsBelow ExpectationsProvides brief or incomplete applications from clinical/personal to practice 2.36 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsProvides no brief, no applications from clinical/personal to practice
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference slide, APA style, grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
5 to >3.56 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsComplete list of references/citations with no APA errors Include peer research-based articles. Speaker notes were included for each slide. 3.56 to >3.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsMostly complete list of references or citations with 1-3 APA errors. Included mostly peer research-based articles. Speaker notes were included for most of the slides. 3 to >2.36 ptsBelow ExpectationsPartial list of references or citations with 3-5 APA errors Include few peer research based articles. Speaker notes were included for less than most slides. 2.36 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsNo references listed or cited with multiple errors. Includes no peer research-based articles. No speaker notes were included.
5
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.