PSYCHOTHERAPY FOR CLIENTS WITH ADDICTIVE DISORDERS
PSYCHOTHERAPY FOR CLIENTS WITH ADDICTIVE DISORDERS
Addictive disorders can be particularly challenging for clients. Not only do these disorders typically interfere with a client’s ability to function in daily life, but they also often manifest as negative and sometimes criminal behaviors. Sometime clients with addictive disorders also suffer from other mental health issues, creating even greater struggles for them to overcome. In your role, you have the opportunity to help clients address their addictions and improve outcomes for both the clients and their families.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
To prepare:
Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about diagnosing and treating addictive disorders. As you watch the 187 Models of Treatment for Addiction video, consider what treatment model you may use the most with clients presenting with addiction.
Search the Walden Library databases and choose a research article that discusses a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.
THE ASSIGNMENT
In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following. Your title and references slides do not count toward the 5- to 10-slide limit.
Provide an overview of the article you selected.
What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?
What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already studied?
What were the author’s claims?
Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your own clients. If so, how? If not, why?
Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.
Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides.
Support your response with at least three other peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Provide references to your sources on your last slide. Be sure to include the article you used as the basis for this Assignment.
BY DAY 7
Submit your Assignment.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your selected research article discussing a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.•Provide an overview of the article you selected, including:What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used?What were the author’s claims?
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered population…. The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied…. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the author’s claims.
17 to >15.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The presentation defines the considered population…. The specific intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied…. The response includes a description of the author’s claims.
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
There is an incomplete definition of the considered population…. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described…. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims.
13 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
There is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it is missing…. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described, or is missing…. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims, or is missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcomeo Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your clients. If so, how? If not, why?
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the findings of the selected article…. The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The presentation includes a review of the findings of the selected article…. The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete review of the findings of the selected article…. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.
17 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review of the findings of the selected article, or is missing…. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.
17 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article, or is missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome•Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides.
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to expand upon the presentation slides.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are vague or contain small inaccuracies.
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The Notes function of the presentation partially or inaccurately expands upon the presentation slides, or is not included.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is scholarly. References are included on your last slide.
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The presentation is strongly supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The presentation is supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The presentation is supported with two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not be included on the last slide.
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The presentation is not supported with resources peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources, and/or the reference list is missing.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Style and Organization: Slides are clear and not overly crowded. Sentences in presenter notes are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Slides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 to >3.5 pts
Good 80%–89%
Slides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Slides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Slides are unorganized and/or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.5 pts
Good 80%–89%
Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
LEARNING RESOURCES
Required Readings
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disordersLinks to an external site. (5th ed., text rev.). https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
“Culture and Psychiatric Diagnosis”
Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2020). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.
Chapter 9, “Motivational Interviewing”
Chapter 19, “Psychotherapeutic Approaches for Addictions and Related Disorders”
Required Media
AllCEUs Counseling Education. (2017, November 4). 187 models of treatment for addiction | Addiction counselor training seriesLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQkA0mIWx8A
Medmastery. (2022, March 8). How to use motivational interviewing in addiction medicineLinks to an external site.. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_wceN5DX7E
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
