Because of the importance of the position, the HR department
Because of the importance of the position, the HR department at C3PO is convinced that some assessment of warehouse team leader candidates is necessary in addition to the traditional resume reviews, reference checks, and individual face-to-face interviews that you’ve always used in this process. In your most recent search for this position, your team administered a standardized test to your finalists to, hopefully, measure their leadership aptitude, but there are many other options available to you. Here are some data that Peter Cunningham has collected regarding those options.ToolCostTimeReliabilityValidity (Criterion)Adverse Impact?Other Info.Leadership Aptitude Test(Used recently)$150/candidate/administration2 hoursTest/re-test r = .78; 1,500 subjects, across all demographicsv = .29 across all front-line supervisors, 30 orgs., various industriesWeak evidence; African-American and Hispanic-AmericanInflated scores for those with strong math background or upper mgmt. experienceGroup Problem-Solving InterviewNo direct costs if conducted on site; 20 hours of HR time3 hours total for all finalistsInter-rater r = .64v = .26 to .32 for supervisory employees across industriesNone known or suspectedSignificant time required to train raters, very flexible as job duties change, candidates report low satisfaction with processWarehouse Operations Knowledge TestPurchase unlimited license for $80090 minutesAmazon: Split halves r = .80Amazon: v = .44 across all warehouse positionsNone known or suspected4-5 hours needed to customize items for C3PO, anecdotal reports from former Amazon employees that some items were redundant and outdatedHonesty/Integrity Test$30/candidate if administered and scored via computer30 minutesTest-retest & split halves r = .88 across all industries and job levelsv = .36 for all ‘blue collar’ professionsModerate evidence; non-native English speakers & candidates from inner citiesPublisher will conduct reliability and validity assessments onsite for $100 flat fee, candidates report moderate satisfaction with processAssessment Center (Admin. Tasks)Estimated $3,500 and 2 months to customize for use in-house.3 hours/candidate, must conduct one at a timeInter-rater r = .73 to .81 across warehouse supervisory personnelv = .40 (approximately) for administrative duties based on 4 studies in similar organizationsNone known or suspected if customized in-houseN/AEquipment Operation SimulationEstimated $11,000 and 3 months to develop and purchase equipment; added expense if expansion or re-design needed to house equipment.1/2 day, could accommodate up to 4 candidates simultaneouslyInter-rater r = .84 among equipment operators regardless of title in similar organizationsv = .54 for equipment operation across all job titles in similar organizationsNone known or suspectedCandidates report high satisfaction with processIt’s really important to hire the right candidates for the C3PO team leader positions, but in this time of cost containment, C3PO is going to have to make some tough decisions about what they should and can do to identify those candidates. Using the reliability and validity data provided, and at least two additional considerations, please provide your top two choices of these tools to help in selecting warehouse team leaders for C3PO and defend your recommendations.Submit your recommendations in a Word document to this assignment prior to the deadline. See the evaluation rubric below for the grading criteria for this assignment.RubricWritten Assignments (1) (1) (5) (1)Written Assignments (1) (1) (5) (1)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendation Rationale15.0 ptsExcellentReliability and validity data are used appropriately in addressing effectiveness and legal defensibility of selection instruments. At least two other considerations that are important to C3PO are effectively used in the recommendations.12.0 ptsSatisfactoryEither reliability or validity is used inappropriately in defending the effectiveness and/or legal defensibility of the recommendations OR one other consideration is not effectively defended as being important to C3PO.9.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryEither reliability or validity is used inappropriately in defending the effectiveness and/or legal defensibility of the recommendations AND at least one other consideration is not effectively defended as being important to C3PO.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics5.0 ptsExcellentSubmission contains very few spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and grammar errors.3.0 ptsSatisfactorySubmission contains a few spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and grammar errors.1.0 ptsUnsatisfactorySubmission contains more than a few spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and grammar errors.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 20.0
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
