NSG321 Advanced Leadership and Management unit 3 prject on ethical issues
Unit 3
Project on Ethical Issues
Unit 3: Introduction (Required Content) (1 of 4)
Unit 3 Discussion: Diversity in the Workplace (2 of 4)
Current Assignment: Unit 3 Assessment: Project on Ethical Issues, Assignment (3 of 4)
Unit 3 Assessment: Shadow Health – Conflict Management, Assignment (4 of 4)
Instructions
Pick an ethical or legal issue in nursing leadership. You may use any of the subjects discussed in prior units or select an issue which is of significance nationally.
Create a PowerPoint presentation detailing this issue. Include background information, why this is an issue, the role of the leader in managing this issue, and proposed solutions.
Identify an ethical or legal issue in nursing, describe background information, and detail why the issue exists.
Identify an ethical or legal issue in nursing, identify the roles of the leader in managing the issue, and describe multiple proposed solutions.
This is to be a 10-15 slide presentation.
Add presenter notes to the slide to enhance the content of the slides, as if you were presenting to a group, and this is your script.
In PowerPoint, access “notes view” to see the presenter notes boxes.
Slides should not contain paragraphs of narrative. They should contain only bullet points or brief explanations.
The longer narratives go in your presenter notes.
Speaker’s notes content will be graded under the “content” sections of the rubric.
Lack of speaker’s notes will significantly affect the grades in those areas.
Create a reference slide and put all references used in the presentation.
4-5 references are required.
Include citations on the slides.
For format and guidelines for PowerPoint presentations check out the Purdue Online Writing Lab (Links to an external site.) web site. (Links to an external site.)
Upload to this assignment submission area by Sunday night at 11:59 pm CT.
Estimated time to complete: 6 – 8 hours
Rubric
NSG321 Presentation Rubric
NSG321 Presentation Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Knowledge
20 pts
Level 5
Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
16 pts
Level 4
Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
12 pts
Level 3
Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline to civic engagement and to tone’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
8 pts
Level 2
Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
4 pts
Level 1
There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is somewhat relevant to civics engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
0 pts
Level 0
There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is somewhat relevant to civics engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content
30 pts
Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
27 pts
Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed
24 pts
Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
21 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
18 pts
Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.
0 pts
Level 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to Research
15 pts
Level 5
Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.
13.5 pts
Level 4
Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.
12 pts
Level 3
Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.
10.5 pts
Level 2
Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.
9 pts
Level 1
Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.
0 pts
Level 0
There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Related Outcomes
15 pts
Level 5
Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
12 pts
Level 4
Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.
9 pts
Level 3
Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and are identified clearly.
6 pts
Level 2
Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).
3 pts
Level 1
Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.
0 pts
Level 0
Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10 pts
Level 5
The presentation exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The presentation has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
8 pts
Level 4
The presentation exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The presentation has no errors in mechanics, or spelling and minor error do not impair the flow of communication.
6 pts
Level 3
The presentation exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The presentation has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
4 pts
Level 2
The presentation exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The presentation has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
2 pts
Level 1
The presentation exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The presentation has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0 pts
Level 0
The presentation does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The presentation has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting
10 pts
Level 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
8 pts
Level 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
6 pts
Level 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
4 pts
Level 2
The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
2 pts
Level 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0 pts
Level 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.