Conduct research on approaches to risk management processes, policies, and concerns in your current or anticipated professional arena to find an example of a risk management plan.
The purpose of this assignment is to analyze a healthcare risk management program.
The concepts in this assignment will be expanded on in the Topic 2 assignment and the Topic 3 benchmark assignment.
Conduct research on approaches to risk management processes, policies, and concerns in your current or anticipated professional arena to find an example of a risk management plan. Look for a plan with sufficient content to be able to complete this assignment successfully. In a 1,000‐1,250-word paper, provide an analysis of the risk management plan that includes the following:
Description of the health care organization to which the plan applies and the role risk management plays in that setting.
Summary of the type of risk management plan you selected (new employee, specific audience, community‐focused, etc.) and your rationale for selecting that example.
Description of the standard administrative steps and processes in a typical health care organization’s risk management program compared to the administrative steps and processes you identify in your selected example plan. (Note: For standard risk management policies and procedures, look up the Medicare Improvement for Patients and Provider Act (MIPPA)-approved accrediting body that regulates the risk management standards in your chosen health care sector, and consider federal, state, and local statutes as well.)
Evaluation of your selected risk management plan’s compliance with the standards of its corresponding MIPPA-approved accrediting body relevant to privacy, health care worker safety, and patient safety.
Analysis of the key agencies and organizations that regulate the administration of safe health care in your current or future area of concentration and an evaluation of the roles each one plays in the risk management oversight process.
Proposed recommendations or changes you would implement in your risk management program example to enhance, improve, or secure the compliance standards.
Proposed recommendation or changes you would implement to build and support a culture of compassion and concern for patients and health care employee safety. Base your response on the Christian worldview principle that work within the public arena should be performed with compassion, justice, and concern for the common good.
In addition to your textbook and the GCU “Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work,” you are required to support your analysis with at least three credible health-related resources.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Requirements: 1000-1250 words
Benchmark – Risk Management Program Analysis – Part One – RubricHealth Care Organization and Role of Risk Management15 pointsCriteria DescriptionDescription of the health care organization to which the plan applies and the role riskmanagement plays in that setting.5. Target15 pointsDescription of the health care organization to which the plan applies and the rolerisk management plays in that setting is comprehensive. The submissionencompasses essential details and provides convincing support.4. Acceptable12.75 pointsDescription of the health care organization to which the plan applies and the rolerisk management plays in that setting is incorporated in full. The submissionencompasses basic details and provides appropriate support.3. Approaching11.25 pointsDescription of the health care organization to which the plan applies and the rolerisk management plays in that setting is incorporated, but minimal detail or supportis provided for one or more components.2. Insufficient9.75 pointsDescription of the health care organization to which the plan applies and the rolerisk management plays in that setting is partially incorporated, but the informationprovided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.Risk Management Plan15 pointsCriteria DescriptionSummary of the type of risk management plan selected (new employee, specificaudience, community-focused, etc.) and personal rationale for selecting that example5. Target15 pointsSummary of the type of risk management plan selected is comprehensive. Thesubmission incorporates specific example with insightful rationale for the selectionand provides convincing support.Collapse All
4. Acceptable12.75 pointsSummary of the type of risk management plan selected is incorporated in full. Thesubmission encompasses basic details and provides appropriate support.3. Approaching11.25 pointsSummary of the type of risk management plan selected is incorporated, butminimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.2. Insufficient9.75 pointsSummary of the type of risk management plan selected is partially incorporated,but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsRisk Management Program Administrative Steps and Processes15 pointsCriteria DescriptionDescription of the standard administrative steps and processes in a typical health carerisk management program of organization compared to the administrative steps andprocesses identified in the selected example plan.5. Target15 pointsDescription of the standard administrative steps and processes in a typical healthcare organization’s risk management program compared to the administrativesteps and processes identified in the selected example plan is comprehensive. Thesubmission encompasses essential details and provides convincing support.4. Acceptable12.75 pointsDescription of the standard administrative steps and processes in a typical healthcare organization’s risk management program compared to the administrativesteps and processes identified in the selected example plan is incorporated in full.The submission encompasses basic details and provides appropriate support.3. Approaching11.25 pointsDescription of the standard administrative steps and processes in a typical healthcare organization’s risk management program compared to the administrativesteps and processes identified in the selected example plan is incorporated, butminimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
2. Insufficient9.75 pointsDescription of the standard administrative steps and processes in a typical healthcare organization’s risk management program compared to the administrativesteps and processes identified in the selected example plan is partiallyRisk Management Plan Compliance (B)15 pointsCriteria DescriptionEvaluation of the selected risk management plan’s compliance with the standards of itscorresponding MIPPA-approved accrediting body relevant to privacy, health careworker safety, and patient safety. (C3.2)5. Target15 pointsEvaluation of the selected risk management plan’s compliance with the standardsof its corresponding MIPPA-approved accrediting body relevant to privacy, healthcare worker safety, and patient safety is comprehensive. The submissionencompasses essential details and provides convincing support.4. Acceptable12.75 pointsEvaluation of the selected risk management plan’s compliance with the standardsof its corresponding MIPPA-approved accrediting body relevant to privacy, healthcare worker safety, and patient safety is incorporated in full. The submissionencompasses basic details and provides appropriate support.3. Approaching11.25 pointsEvaluation of the selected risk management plan’s compliance with the standardsof its corresponding MIPPA-approved accrediting body relevant to privacy, healthcare worker safety, and patient safety is incorporated, but minimal detail or supportis provided for one or more components.2. Insufficient9.75 pointsEvaluation of the selected risk management plan’s compliance with the standardsof its corresponding MIPPA-approved accrediting body relevant to privacy, healthcare worker safety, and patient safety is partially incorporated, but the informationprovided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.Key Regulatory Agencies and Organizations15 pointsCriteria DescriptionAnalysis of the key agencies and organizations that regulate the administration of safehealth care in current or future area of concentration and an evaluation of the roles
each one plays in the risk management oversight process.5. Target15 pointsAnalysis of the key agencies and organizations that regulate the administration ofsafe health care in current or future area of concentration and an evaluation of theroles each one plays in the risk management oversight process are comprehensive.The submission encompasses essential details and provides convincing support.4. Acceptable12.75 pointsAnalysis of the key agencies and organizations that regulate the administration ofsafe health care in current or future area of concentration and an evaluation of theroles each one plays in the risk management oversight process are incorporated infull. The submission encompasses basic details and provides appropriate support.3. Approaching11.25 pointsAnalysis of the key agencies and organizations that regulate the administration ofsafe health care in current or future area of concentration and an evaluation of theroles each one plays in the risk management oversight process are incorporated,but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.2. Insufficient9.75 pointsAnalysis of the key agencies and organizations that regulate the administration ofsafe health care in current or future area of concentration and an evaluation of theroles each one plays in the risk management oversight process are partiallyincorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwiseRecommendations to the Risk Management Program Example15 pointsCriteria DescriptionRecommendations or changes to implement in the risk management program exampleto enhance, improve, or secure the compliance standards.5. Target15 pointsRecommendations or changes to implement in the risk management programexample to enhance, improve, or secure the compliance standards arecomprehensive. The submission encompasses essential details and providesconvincing support.4. Acceptable12.75 pointsRecommendations or changes to implement in the risk management programexample to enhance, improve, or secure the compliance standards are
incorporated in full. The submission encompasses basic details and providesappropriate support.3. Approaching11.25 pointsRecommendations or changes to implement in the risk management programexample to enhance, improve, or secure the compliance standards areincorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or morecomponents.2. Insufficient9.75 pointsRecommendations or changes to implement in the risk management programexample to enhance, improve, or secure the compliance standards are partiallyitdbtthiftiiddiiltitthiRecommendations to the Build and Support a Culture of Compassion andConcern15 pointsCriteria DescriptionRecommendation or changes that could be implemented to build and support aculture of compassion and concern for patients and health care employee safety.Response is based on the Christian worldview principle that work within the publicarena is to be performed with compassion, justice, and concern for the common good5. Target15 pointsRecommendation or changes that could be implemented to build to build andsupport a culture of compassion and concern for patients and health careemployee safety. The Christian worldview principle that work within the publicarena is to be performed with compassion, justice, and concern for the commongood is comprehensive. The submission encompasses essential details andprovides convincing support.4. Acceptable12.75 pointsRecommendation or changes that could be implemented to build to build andsupport a culture of compassion and concern for patients and health careemployee safety. The Christian worldview principle that work within the publicarena is to be performed with compassion, justice, and concern for the commongood is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses basic details andprovides appropriate support.3. Approaching11.25 pointsRecommendation or changes that could be implemented to build and support aculture of compassion and concern for patients and health care employee safety.The Christian worldview principle that work within the public arena is to beperformed with compassion, justice, and concern for the common good is
incorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or morecomponents.2. Insufficient9.75 pointsRecommendation or changes that could be implemented to build and support aculture of compassion and concern for patients and health care employee safety.The Christian worldview principle that work within the public arena is to beperformed with compassion, justice, and concern for the common good is partiallyincorporatedbuttheinformationprovidedisincompleteinaccurateorotherwiseThesis, Position, or Purpose10.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionCommunicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.5. Target10.5 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearlydirected to a specific audience.4. Acceptable8.92 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of theappropriate audience is demonstrated.3. Approaching7.88 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionallyweak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.2. Insufficient6.83 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very littleawareness of the intended audience.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsDevelopment, Structure, and Conclusion10.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionAdvances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolvesfrom development.5. Target10.5 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progressionof ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the
development of the purpose.4. Acceptable8.92 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build oneach other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.3. Approaching7.88 pointsLimited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There areinconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplisticand not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.2. Insufficient6.83 pointsWriting lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Someorganization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear andnot supported by the overall development of the purpose.Evidence9 pointsCriteria DescriptionSelects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considersother perspectives.5. Target9 pointsSpecific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others areclearly considered.4. Acceptable7.65 pointsRelevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.3. Approaching6.75 pointsEvidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation orintegration of other perspectives is present.2. Insufficient5.85 pointsEvidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives issuperficial or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory0 points
Mechanics of Writing9 pointsCriteria DescriptionIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentencestructure, etc.5. Target9 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentencestructure are used throughout.4. Acceptable7.65 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentencestructure are used.3. Approaching6.75 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generallyappropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.2. Insufficient5.85 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in languagechoice or sentence structure are recurrent.Format/Documentation6 pointsCriteria DescriptionUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,appropriate to assignment and discipline.5. Target6 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.4. Acceptable5.1 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.3. Approaching4.5 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obviouserrors.2. Insufficient3.9 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errorsin documentation of sources are evident.Total150points
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
