This week you examined two seemingly related laws: COPPA and CIPA. They are related because they both tend to protect children. Yet, as you read, they do not even agree on what a child??

This week you examined two seemingly related laws: COPPA and CIPA. They are related because they both tend to protect children. Yet, as you read, they do not even agree on what a “child” is.

In this Discussion, therefore, it is time to start analyzing these complicated, complex legal concepts. Read, or re-read, the Chapter 5 materials on COPPA and CIPA. Review the weblinks provided in the Week 2 folder where official U.S. government guidance about them are provided. Conduct outside research as needed.

Initial Post

By Wednesday, submit an Initial Post that addresses these questions, at the least:

1. What are some distinctions between COPPA and CIPA? Similarities?
2. Describe an organization that might be subject to both laws, and explain why you believe they both may apply.
3. Why do you believe that these two laws define “child” differently? Is it rational to do so?
4. Lastly, feel free to add further analyses or commentary that reflects your understanding of the two related but distinct laws.

Responsive Posts

The responses should be thoughtful and engaging. They should reflect that you understand both the laws at issue and your classmates’ perspectives on them. You may agree, challenge, or both. Do not merely respond with that—“I agree with you about why “child” should mean the same thing.” is not a useful, engaged Responsive Post. Rather, respond with care and thoughtfulness attributable to a graduate student’s capabilities.