What group strategies are going well? Explain why these strategies are effective. (2) What specific improvements need to be made? For the Self-Evaluation section, address the

For this assignment, each student will submit a brief WORD document (double spaced) that contains two headings: Peer Evaluation and Self-Evaluation. For the Peer Evaluation section, address the following elements: (1) What group strategies are going well? Explain why these strategies are effective. (2) What specific improvements need to be made? For the Self-Evaluation section, address the following elements: (1) What individual strengths do you bring to the final project? (2) What is a challenge (growth edge) that you can improve upon in moving forward with the final project? (3) What can you do to improve your own contributions to the group’s goals and processes in the second half of the semester? The paper should be approximately one double-spaced page; address all of the criteria, and demonstrate clear and correct writing. 

*PhD Student(s): Address the first two components for the Self-Evaluation PLUS one additional element (of your choice) that is relevant to your progress in developing the manuscript.

*Save/name the file according to instructions in the course syllabus.

Due Sun, Mar 12 @ 11:59 p.m. CST

Rubric

Excellent (10-9): Student addresses all of the criteria and demonstrates critical thinking. Student demonstrates clear and correct writing.

Above Average (8): Student addresses all of the criteria and mostly demonstrates critical thinking. Student mostly demonstrates clear and correct writing.

Average (7): Student may not clearly address all of the criteria. Critical thinking is average, and writing may contain more than a few errors. 

Below Average (6 & Below): Student did not address all of the criteria. Critical thinking is below average, and writing may contain multiple errors.