Having a complete understanding of the needs of a campus and a willingness to learn the facility management aspects of running a school will enhance a principals ability to be proactive and
Having a complete understanding of the needs of a campus and a willingness to learn the facility management aspects of running a school will enhance a principal’s ability to be proactive and intentional in maintaining a clean, safe, and secure learning environment.
Allocate at least 2 hours in the field to support this field experience.
Reflect on the key roles of a principal as they relate to explaining, clarifying, and demonstrating the duties and functions required for managing a school facility.
With the site facility manager/maintenance supervisor, tour your school campus, review his or her campus operation duties (based on the job description), and evaluate items regarding, but not limited to, safety, repairs, maintenance, and cleanliness. Determine issues that would be considered a liability by the district insurance company. Identify possible solutions to any areas of needed improvement.
Use any remaining field experience hours to assist the principal mentor and, provided permission, seek opportunities to observe and/or assist the principal mentor.
Write a 150-200 word reflection summarizing your observations and solutions. Include in your discussion the safety and welfare of students and staff, the allocation of resources, and what procedures your principal mentor uses to monitor and manage operations. Incorporate PSEL Standards 7 and 10 into your reflection and describe how you will apply what you have learned to your future professional practice.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Clinical Field Experience C: Evaluating Campus Operations – Rubric
Safety and Welfare of Students and Sta� 6 points
Criteria Description
Safety and Welfare of Students and Staff
5. Target 6 points
Reflection comprehensively discusses observations and solutions regarding safety
and welfare of students and staff.
4. Acceptable 5.22 points
Reflection concisely discusses observations and solutions regarding safety and
welfare of students and staff.
3. Approaching 4.44 points
Reflection minimally discusses observations and solutions regarding safety and
welfare of students and staff.
2. Insufficient 4.14 points
Reflection fails to adequately discuss observations and solutions regarding safety
and welfare of students and staff.
Allocation of Resources 6 points
Criteria Description
Allocation of Resources
5. Target 6 points
Reflection realistically and thoroughly discusses the allocation of resources.
4. Acceptable 5.22 points
Reflection clearly and relevantly discusses the allocation of resources.
3. Approaching 4.44 points
Reflection vaguely discusses the allocation of resources.
Collapse All
2. Insufficient 4.14 points
Reflection unrealistically discusses the allocation of resources.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Procedures to Monitor and Manage Operations 6 points
Criteria Description
Procedures to Monitor and Manage Operations
5. Target 6 points
Reflection expertly discusses procedures used to monitor and manage operations.
4. Acceptable 5.22 points
Reflection competently discusses procedures used to monitor and manage
operations.
3. Approaching 4.44 points
Reflection partially discusses procedures used to monitor and manage operations.
2. Insufficient 4.14 points
Reflection incomprehensively discusses procedures used to monitor and manage
operations.
1. No Submission 0 points
PSEL Standards 7 and 10 and Implications for Future Practice 6 points
Criteria Description
PSEL Standards 7 and 10 and Implications for Future Practice
5. Target 6 points
Reflection proficiently discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 7 and 10 are expertly incorporated into reflection.
4. Acceptable 5.22 points
Reflection logically discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 7 and 10 are accurately incorporated into reflection.
3. Approaching 4.44 points
Reflection inexplicitly discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 7 and 10 are weakly addressed.
2. Insufficient 4.14 points
Reflection unrealistically discusses implications for application as a future
practitioner. Elements of PSEL Standards 7 and 10 are inaccurately addressed.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Organization 3 points
Criteria Description
Organization
5. Target 3 points
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas
that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides
the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the
required word count.
4. Acceptable 2.61 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The
content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is
within a reasonable range of the required word count.
3. Approaching 2.22 points
The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with
a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the
required word count.
2. Insufficient 2.07 points
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The
ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the
summary is widely outside of the required word count.
Mechanics of Writing 3 points
Criteria Description
includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use
5. Target 3 points
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-
developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are
varied and engaging.
4. Acceptable 2.61 points
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder
comprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some
practice and content-related language.
3. Approaching 2.22 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent
language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.
2. Insufficient 2.07 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.
1. No Submission 0 points
Total 30 points
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
