As a leader on your campus, it is important to understand the safety procedures you are responsible for implementing with your students and staff. Obtain and review your schools emergency pl
As a leader on your campus, it is important to understand the safety procedures you are responsible for implementing with your students and staff.
Obtain and review your school’s emergency plan, drill schedule, any additional action steps to address adverse situations in the school setting, district policies relating to student and staff safety, and any other existing emergency plans.
If possible, participate in an emergency drill, acting from the principal’s role. Interview your principal mentor or another campus leader about maintaining safety on the school campus.
Suggested questions include, but are not limited to:
- What do you consider are the most important tasks related to keeping students and staff safe on the school campus?
- Do you feel your school campus is safe for students and staff? What is working? What would you like to add to your campus to ensure their well-being?
- How do you train teachers and staff for emergencies? What is required by law? Do you do anything beyond what is legally required?
- Are you always able to follow your planned emergency drill schedule? If not, how do you document that?
- How do you decide what safety or emergency information you will communicate to families? The community?
- When communicating safety or emergency information to families and/or the community, what methods do you use?
Use any remaining field experience hours to assist the principal mentor and, provided permission, seek opportunities to observe and/or assist the principal mentor.
Write a 250-500 word reflection on your experiences. Incorporate PSEL Standards 5 and 8 into your reflection and describe how you will apply what you have learned to your future professional practice.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
Clinical Field Experience D: Protecting the Welfare and Safety of Students and
Staff – Rubric
Emergency Plan 9 points
Criteria Description
Emergency Plan
5. Target 9 points
Review of emergency plans or drills is thorough.
4. Acceptable 7.83 points
Review of emergency plans or drills is included.
3. Approaching 6.66 points
Review of emergency plans or drills is weak.
2. Insufficient 6.21 points
Review of emergency plans or drills is not included.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Principal Interview 9 points
Criteria Description
Principal Interview
5. Target 9 points
Interview of principal extensively addresses safety procedures on campus.
4. Acceptable 7.83 points
Interview of principal addresses safety procedures on campus in detail.
3. Approaching 6.66 points
Interview of principal vaguely addresses safety procedures on campus.
Collapse All
2. Insufficient 6.21 points
Interview of principal does not address safety procedures on campus.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
PSEL Standards 5 and 8 and Implications for Future Practice 6 points
Criteria Description
PSEL Standards 5 and 8 and Implications for Future Practice
5. Target 6 points
Reflection proficiently discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 5 and 8 are expertly incorporated into reflection.
4. Acceptable 5.22 points
Reflection logically discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 5 and 8 are accurately incorporated into reflection.
3. Approaching 4.44 points
Reflection inexplicitly discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.
Elements of PSEL Standards 5 and 8 are weakly addressed.
2. Insufficient 4.14 points
Reflection unrealistically discusses implications for application as a future
practitioner. Elements of PSEL Standards 5 and 8 are inaccurately addressed.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Organization 3 points
Criteria Description
Organization
5. Target 3 points
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas
that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides
the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the
required word count.
4. Acceptable 2.61 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The
content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is
within a reasonable range of the required word count.
3. Approaching 2.22 points
The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with
a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the
required word count.
2. Insufficient 2.07 points
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The
ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the
summary is widely outside of the required word count.
Mechanics of Writing 3 points
Criteria Description
includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use
5. Target 3 points
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-
developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are
varied and engaging.
4. Acceptable 2.61 points
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder
comprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some
practice and content-related language.
3. Approaching 2.22 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent
language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.
2. Insufficient 2.07 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.
1. No Submission 0 points
Total 30 points
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
