Researchers are conducting a retrospective cohort study to examine whether use of aspirin leads to increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC)
Researchers are conducting a retrospective cohort study to examine whether use of aspirin leads to increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and will use medical records from 1990 through 2015 from a large hospital system. Selection of participants for the study should be based on which of the following:
Patients’ CRC status (i.e. outcome status)
Patients having received care in the hospital system during the study period
Both of the above
Neither of the above
In the study of aspirin and CRC from question above, some participants stopped coming for care during the follow-up period so their outcomes cannot be ascertained (i.e. they were lost to follow-up). The researchers observe that a higher proportion of participants who did not use aspirin were lost from the study compared to those did use aspirin, and they are concerned that those LTF were less likely to have developed CRC. How could this scenario bias the results of the study?
The observed RR will not be biased
The observed RR will be biased away from the null compared to the truth
The observed RR will be biased towards the null compared to the truth
None of the above
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
