October 11, 2022

NURS-6053 Module 4: Communication and Relationship Building (Weeks 7-9) Papers

–Downloads–Download Video w/CCDownload AudioDownload Transcript

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Diagnosis: Communication Breakdown [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Learning Objectives – NURS-6053 Module 4: Communication and Relationship Building (Weeks 7-9) Papers

Students will:

Assess work environments for workplace civility
Analyze strategies to address workplace incivility
Analyze evidence-based theories for promoting organizational health
Recommend strategies for improving workplace environments

Due By	Assignment
Week 7, Days 1–2	Read the Learning Resources. Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 7, Day 3	Post your initial Discussion post. Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 7, Days 4-5	Review peer Discussion posts. Compose your peer Discussion responses. Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 7, Day 6	Post two peer Discussion responses.
Week 8, Days 1-7	Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 9, Days 1-6	Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 9, Day 7	Deadline to submit your Assignment.

Photo Credit: [Steve Debenport]/[ E+]/Getty Images

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTIONS

Learning Resources – NURS-6053 Module 4: Communication and Relationship Building (Weeks 7-9) Papers

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Required Readings

Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

Chapter 5, “Collaborative Leadership Contexts: Networks, Communication, Decision Making, and Motivation” (pp. 121–144)

Chapter 9, “Creating and Shaping the Organizational Environment and Culture to Support Practice Excellence” (pp. 247–278)

Chapter 10, “Building Cohesive and Effective Teams” (pp. 279–298)

Select at least ONE of the following:

Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leader perspectives. Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324–330. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c4

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Clark, C. M. (2018). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based scripting to address incivility. Nurse Educator. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000563

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf

Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542. doi:10.3928/00220124-20141122-02

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Document: Work Environment Assessment Template (Word document)

Required Media

TEDx. (2017, April). Jody Hoffer Gittell: The power of a simple idea [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7nL5RC5kdE

Laureate Education (Producer). (2009a). Working with Groups and Teams [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

–Downloads–Download Video w/CCDownload AudioDownload Transcript

Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment

How healthy is your workplace?

You may think your current organization operates seamlessly, or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldn’t try to determine the health of a patient through mere observation, you should not attempt to gauge the health of your work environment based on observation and opinion. Often, there are issues you perceive as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may run much deeper than leadership recognizes.

There are many factors and measures that may impact organizational health. Among these is civility. While an organization can institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the use of tools in measuring workplace civility.

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.

By Day 3 of Week 7

Post a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Explain why your workplace is or is not civil. Then, describe a situation where you have experienced incivility in the workplace. How was this addressed? Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 7

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by sharing ideas for how shortcomings discovered in their evaluations and/or their examples of incivility could have been managed more effectively.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 7 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 7

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 7 Discussion

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week07_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.NURS-6053 Module 4: Communication and Relationship Building (Weeks 7-9) Papers
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with two credible sources.

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible sources.

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.NURS-6053 Module 4: Communication and Relationship Building (Weeks 7-9) Papers
Participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week07_Discussion_Rubric

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTIONS

Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment

Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.

In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
- Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
- Clark (2018)
- Clark (2015)
- Griffin and Clark (2014)

The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

By Day 7 of Week 9

Submit your Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 9 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 9 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 9 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 9 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9

To submit your Assignment:

Week 9 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next Module:

Module 5

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment · Complete the Work Environment Assessment Template. · Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace. · Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea that you believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. · Explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of your workplace.	45 (45%) – 50 (50%) An accurate, detailed, and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided. The responses accurately and thoroughly describe in detail the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace. The responses accurately and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe in detail at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.	40 (40%) – 44 (44%) An accurate and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided. The responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace. The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.NURS-6053 Module 4: Communication and Relationship Building (Weeks 7-9) Papers	35 (35%) – 39 (39%) A completed Work Environment Assessment Template that is vague or inaccurate is provided. The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate. The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate. The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.	0 (0%) – 34 (34%) A vague and inaccurate Work Environment Assessment Template is provided, or is missing. The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature · Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected. · Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. · Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.	14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected. The responses accurately and completely explain in detail how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment. The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.	12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected. The responses accurately explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment. The responses accurately explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Specific examples are provided which may support the responses.NURS-6053 Module 4: Communication and Relationship Building (Weeks 7-9) Papers	11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate. The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate. The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague or inaccurate. Vague or inaccurate examples are provided which may support the responses.	0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Specific examples are not provided to support the responses.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams · Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment. · Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.	18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.	16 (16%) – 19 (19%) The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers. Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper? Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials. We write plagiarism Free Content Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties. Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions. NURS-6053 Module 3: Leadership (Weeks 4-6) Nursing Papers NURS-6053 Module 5: Organizational Change (Weeks 10-11) Papers Related Posts Uncategorized John Doe has decided to clone himself. He is sterile Uncategorized Prepare a 2- to 3-page paper (not counting the cover and reference pages) discussing how the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, safety laws, or other state laws might apply to the following scenario. Uncategorized Capital Budget Methodologies Why Choose Us Best Essay Writing Services- Get Quality Homework Essay Paper at Discounted Prices At the risk of sounding immodest, we must point out that we have an elite team of writers. Ours isn’t a collection of individuals who are good at searching for information on the Internet and then conveniently re-writing the information obtained to barely beat Plagiarism Software. Who can’t do that? Our writers have strong academic backgrounds with regards to their areas of writing. A paper on History will only be handled by a writer who is trained in that field. A paper on health care can only be dealt with by a writer qualified on matters health care. Thesis papers will only be handled by Masters’ Degree holders while Dissertations will strictly be handled by PhD holders. With such a system, you needn’t worry about the quality of work. Quality isn’t just an option, it is the only option. We don’t just employ writers, we hire professionals. We have writers spread into all fields including but not limited to Philosophy, Economics, Business, Medicine, Nursing, Education, Technology, Tourism and Travels, Leadership, History, Poverty, Marketing, Climate Change, Social Justice, Chemistry, Mathematics, Literature, Accounting and Political Science. Our writers are also well trained to follow client instructions as well adhere to various writing conventional writing structures as per the demand of specific articles. They are also well versed with citation styles such as APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and Oxford which come handy during the preparation of academic papers. They also have unrivalled skill in writing language be it UK English or USA English considering that they are native English speakers. You also needn’t worry about logical flow of thought, sentence structure as well as proper use of phrases. Our writers are also not the kind to decorate articles with unnecessary filler words. We respect your money and most importantly your trust in us. In writing, we will be precise and to the point and fill the paper with content as opposed to words aimed at beating the word count. Our shift-system also ensures that you get fresh writers each time you send a job. This helps overcome occupational hazards brought about by fatigue. Hence, quality will consistently be at the top. From our writers, you expect; good quality work, friendly service, timely deliveries, and adherence to client’s demands and specifications. Once you’ve submitted your writing requests, you can go take a stroll while waiting for our all-star team of writers and editors to submit top quality work. How Our Website Works Get an Essay from Us College Essays is the biggest affiliate and testbank for WriteDen. We hire writers from all over the world with an aim to give the best essays to our clients. Our writers will help you write all your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors who read each paper from our writers just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. Step 1 To make an Order you only need to click ORDER NOW and we will direct you to our Order Page. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline. Deadline range from 6 hours to 30 days. Step 2 Once done with writing your paper we will upload it to your account on our website and also forward a copy to your email. Step 3 Upon receiving your paper, review it and if any changes are needed contact us immediately. We offer unlimited revisions at no extra cost. Is it Safe to use our services? We never resell papers on this site. Meaning after your purchase you will get an original copy of your assignment and you have all the rights to use the paper. Pricing and Discounts Our price ranges from $8-$14 per page. If you are short of Budget, contact our Live Support for a Discount Code. All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure. Please note we do not have prewritten answers. We need some time to prepare a perfect essay for you. Recent Posts What makes a legal, fair, and ethical performance management system? Write a summary in Microsoft Word of the pharmacodynamics of the herbal supplement Discuss two or three historical shifts in leadership that eventually led to the creation of the human resources position HOW RELIABLE IS YOUR MEMORY? Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Behavioral Learning Theory, Attribution Theory, and Expectancy Theory College Pal All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions College pals.com Privacy Policy 2010-2018

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment

·  Complete the Work Environment Assessment Template.
·   Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
·   Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea that you believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.
·   Explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of your workplace.

45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

An accurate, detailed, and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided.

The responses accurately and thoroughly describe in detail the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.

The responses accurately and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe in detail at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.

The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

An accurate and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided.

The responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.

The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.

The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.NURS-6053 Module 4: Communication and Relationship Building (Weeks 7-9) Papers

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

A completed Work Environment Assessment Template that is vague or inaccurate is provided.

The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.

The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate.

The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

A vague and inaccurate Work Environment Assessment Template is provided, or is missing.

The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature

·   Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected.
·   Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
·   Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.

The responses accurately and completely explain in detail how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.

The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.

Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.

The responses accurately explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.

The responses accurately explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.

Specific examples are provided which may support the responses.NURS-6053 Module 4: Communication and Relationship Building (Weeks 7-9) Papers

11 (11%) – 11 (11%)

The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate.

The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate.

The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague or inaccurate.

Vague or inaccurate examples are provided which may support the responses.

0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Specific examples are not provided to support the responses.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams

· Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
· Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.

The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.

16 (16%) – 19 (19%)

The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.

The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.

Why Choose Us

Best Essay Writing Services- Get Quality Homework Essay Paper at Discounted Prices

At the risk of sounding immodest, we must point out that we have an elite team of writers. Ours isn’t a collection of individuals who are good at searching for information on the Internet and then conveniently re-writing the information obtained to barely beat Plagiarism Software. Who can’t do that?

Our writers have strong academic backgrounds with regards to their areas of writing. A paper on History will only be handled by a writer who is trained in that field. A paper on health care can only be dealt with by a writer qualified on matters health care. Thesis papers will only be handled by Masters’ Degree holders while Dissertations will strictly be handled by PhD holders. With such a system, you needn’t worry about the quality of work. Quality isn’t just an option, it is the only option. We don’t just employ writers, we hire professionals.

We have writers spread into all fields including but not limited to Philosophy, Economics, Business, Medicine, Nursing, Education, Technology, Tourism and Travels, Leadership, History, Poverty, Marketing, Climate Change, Social Justice, Chemistry, Mathematics, Literature, Accounting and Political Science.

Our writers are also well trained to follow client instructions as well adhere to various writing conventional writing structures as per the demand of specific articles.

They are also well versed with citation styles such as APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and Oxford which come handy during the preparation of academic papers.

They also have unrivalled skill in writing language be it UK English or USA English considering that they are native English speakers. You also needn’t worry about logical flow of thought, sentence structure as well as proper use of phrases.

Our writers are also not the kind to decorate articles with unnecessary filler words. We respect your money and most importantly your trust in us. In writing, we will be precise and to the point and fill the paper with content as opposed to words aimed at beating the word count.

Our shift-system also ensures that you get fresh writers each time you send a job. This helps overcome occupational hazards brought about by fatigue. Hence, quality will consistently be at the top.

From our writers, you expect; good quality work, friendly service, timely deliveries, and adherence to client’s demands and specifications.

Once you’ve submitted your writing requests, you can go take a stroll while waiting for our all-star team of writers and editors to submit top quality work.

How Our Website Works

Get an Essay from Us

College Essays is the biggest affiliate and testbank for WriteDen. We hire writers from all over the world with an aim to give the best essays to our clients.

Our writers will help you write all your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors who read each paper from our writers just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE.

Step 1
To make an Order you only need to click ORDER NOW and we will direct you to our Order Page. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline. Deadline range from 6 hours to 30 days.

Step 2
Once done with writing your paper we will upload it to your account on our website and also forward a copy to your email.

Step 3
Upon receiving your paper, review it and if any changes are needed contact us immediately. We offer unlimited revisions at no extra cost.

Is it Safe to use our services?
We never resell papers on this site. Meaning after your purchase you will get an original copy of your assignment and you have all the rights to use the paper.

Pricing and Discounts
Our price ranges from $8-$14 per page. If you are short of Budget, contact our Live Support for a Discount Code. All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.
Please note we do not have prewritten answers. We need some time to prepare a perfect essay for you.

NURS-6053 Module 4: Communication and Relationship Building (Weeks 7-9) Papers