What ethical issue is represented in this case study? (5 pts)
Order Instructions
M7: Case Study Analysis
Due No Due Date Points 25 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Case Study
Imagine you are a pediatric nurse. You have been providing care for an infant with failure to thrive and a congenital heart defect. The infant will require multiple types of home medical monitoring equipment and a very expensive surgery to save his life. As the child grows, he will need continued follow-up care and smaller palliative surgeries to ensure his health. The family comes from a strict Amish community in which the elders of the community make all final medical decisions. The parents want the medical team to save their baby; however, they declined treatment because the Amish elders have decided that the community cannot endure the continued cost associated with prolonged medical care. It is your job to discharge the family home, knowing the child will die at home.
1. What ethical issue is represented in this case study? (5 pts)
2. How does Amish culture shape the parents’ views of death and dying? Cite at least one outside source you utilized to help you understand Amish culture. (10 pts)
3. Why could this be a difficult assignment for the nurse? (10 pts)
To complete this assignment, click “Submit your assignment,” and then choose one of the following methods for submitting your work:
1. Drag and drop your file into the submission box, and then select “Submit file.”
2. Select the file you want to upload, and then select “Submit file.”
Please contact your instructor using Canvas Messages with any questions you may have. Your instructor may take several business days to grade all of your work. Please be patient as your instructor works to provide a level of feedback that corresponds to the hard work you put into the assignment.
PL_icon_gray.png
Rubric
M7 Case Study Analysis
M7 Case Study Analysis
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
5 to >4.0 pts
Distinguished
Prompts are addressed correctly, accurately, and appropriately (in sufficient detail)
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Prompts are addressed correctly and accurately; lack of detail present at times
3 to >2.0 pts
Developing
Uneven in the answer accuracy and level of detail
2 to >1.0 pts
Minimal
Significant problems with providing sufficient content and/or answering accurately
1 to >0 pts
Absent
Content is inaccurate or greatly lacking in detail
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence
5 to >4.0 pts
Distinguished
Relevant and important information from the module systematically utilized and integrated; evidence clearly supports points
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Evidence is provided, including support for all major points, although priority is not given to the most important ideas / terms
3 to >2.0 pts
Developing
Uneven in how often the evidence from the module supports statements
2 to >1.0 pts
Minimal
Limited use of evidence from the module for positions, or poor sources selected
1 to >0 pts
Absent
Fails to provide evidence for positions from the module
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5 to >4.0 pts
Distinguished
Highly attuned to appropriate language, level of formality, and appropriate tone of writing Few to no grammar or language problems
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Engaging tone with appropriate level of formality and audience awareness Some minor errors but they do not occur throughout the paper
3 to >2.0 pts
Developing
Uneven tone, level of formality and/or audience awareness; or, minor errors throughout the paper; or, some major APA or writing concerns at times
2 to >1.0 pts
Minimal
Either: inappropriate tone or level of formality, frequent major grammar/language/APA errors throughout the paper
1 to >0 pts
Absent
Lacks awareness of audience, appropriate tone and level of formality; Major errors in conventional use of grammar / language that interfere with paper readability
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation
5 to >4.0 pts
Distinguished
High quality evaluation; thoughts are carefully considered and carefully explained
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Acceptable quality evaluation; thoughts are fairly well-considered and explained
3 to >2.0 pts
Developing
Evaluation is attempted; some articulation of writer’s thoughts but lacking sufficient detail
2 to >1.0 pts
Minimal
Minimal evaluation present; surface level evaluation with minimal detail
1 to >0 pts
Absent
Evaluation is absent
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollows Prompt
5 to >4.0 pts
Distinguished
Fully addresses all questions in the prompt
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Addresses nearly all aspects of the prompt
3 to >2.0 pts
Developing
Unevenly addresses prompt
2 to >1.0 pts
Minimal
Significant problems with addressing prompt
1 to >0 pts
Absent
Prompt is not addressed
5 pts
Total Points: 25
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
