ETHICS DISCUSSION Review 1.3.2 ‘The Vlasovic Case’ on pages 9-10. Compare and contrast the ways that this case is

I want these questions answered in 200 words each  

                                                                              ETHICS

DISCUSSION

Review 1.3.2 "The Vlasovic Case" on pages 9-10. Compare and contrast the ways that this case is similar to and different from the first week's 1.1 "Impaired Driver Case" on page 1. In doing so discuss moral cases versus ethical cases. The goal of this discussion is to begin to think in terms of morals and ethics.

                                                                          SOCIAL WORK

Introduction to Social Work online textbook:- https://ferrisintroductiontosocialwork.pressbooks.com/front-matter/introduction/

LESSON 3 DISCUSSION

Discussion question:

After reviewing the readings and video, please create a substantial discussion post considering the following question(s) in your post.

· What do you think are the most important values for a successful Social Worker?

· Please identify 2-3 values that you think will enable you to be an effective Social Worker?

                                                             SOCIAL WELFARE & POLICY

LESSON 2 DISCUSSION

On one page, discuss any type of social work interventions that you have seen implemented.   What did you learn from that experience?  If you have not seen any of the interventions, what type of intervention would you support or not support and why? 

LESSON 3 DISCUSSION

Discussion Guidelines: Your initial post should be approximately one page (250 words). 

In your opinion, what are the responsibilities of government during economic crises? Use examples from the assigned chapter and/or provide examples from the present day. 

LESSON 4 DISCUSSION

Discussion Guidelines: Your initial post should be approximately one page (250 words). 

Briefly research how social security benefits are earned. Describe your findings in your discussion question and discuss whether you agree or disagree with your findings and what you would change.