(I prefer a 14 slide power point)
Unit 4 Assessment – Mid-Term Project
- Due Jun 24 by 11:59pm
- Points 90
- Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Instructions
Apply: Knowledge Gained
Evaluation Title: Mid-Term Project
Imagine you have been asked by your local church, synagogue, scouting group, sports team or some other community organization, to give a 15-20 minute talk about addiction. Imagine there has been some concern in the community about how to deal with the problem. Youve been asked to talk about what happens to the brain when people become addicted.
Your presentation may be in any of the following forms:
- PowerPoint presentation with notes (10 slides minimum, APA format)
- 3-5 page paper (APA format)
- Other presentation formats (must be approved by the instructor by the middle of the week)
Your PowerPoint should:
- include citations and references in each slide (as appropriate) and a references slide at the end of the presentation.
- reflect not only your opinion but also your familiarity with the material from the course.
- Pay attention to your formatting and professionalism of the presentation.
- Alternative presentations must include citations and a reference page and should be professional in appearance.
Your paper should:
- be three to five pages long.
- reflect not only your opinion but also your familiarity with the material from the course.
- be typed into a Word or other word processing document, formatted in APA style.
- include In-text citations in the body of your writing and full source citations in your reference page.
- be written using have font size 10-12 pt. (Times New Roman 12, Arial 11, Calibri 11, Lucida Sans Unicode 10, Georgia 11).
- be double spaced and include an APA formatted title and reference page.
- The title page should include:
- Assignment Name
- Students Name
- University
- Course Name and Number
- Instructors Name
- Assignment Due Date
Here is additional information to review which discusses how to format your paper and highlights of the new changes from the 6th to 7th edition of the APA Manual.
Estimated time to complete: 4 hours
Rubric
PS101 Unit 4 Assessment – Midterm Project
PS101 Unit 4 Assessment – Midterm Project
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content
PS101-CO1; PS101-CO3
|
27 pts
Level 5
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.
|
24 pts
Level 4
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.
|
22 pts
Level 3
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.
|
19 pts
Level 2
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.
|
16 pts
Level 1
Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.
|
0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions
|
|
27 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis
PRICE-P
|
27 pts
Level 5
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
|
24 pts
Level 4
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
|
22 pts
Level 3
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
|
19 pts
Level 2
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
|
16 pts
Level 1
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
|
0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
|
|
27 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Technology
|
18 pts
Level 5
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.
|
16 pts
Level 4
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.
|
14 pts
Level 3
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.
|
13 pts
Level 2
Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.
|
11 pts
Level 1
Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.
|
0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.
|
|
18 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing
|
13.5 pts
Level 5
The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
|
12 pts
Level 4
The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
|
10 pts
Level 3
The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication
|
9 pts
Level 2
The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
|
7 pts
Level 1
The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
|
0 pts
Level 0
The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
|
|
13.5 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA
PRICE-I
|
4.5 pts
Level 5
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.
|
4 pts
Level 4
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.
|
3 pts
Level 3
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.
|
2 pts
Level 2
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.
|
1 pts
Level 1
The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements
|
0 pts
Level 0
There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.
|
|
4.5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 90
|
Grade: 0 (90 pts possible)
Graded Anonymously: no
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
Comments: