Resubmit Week 4 with professor feedback addressed. 5 % Unacceptable- Did not resubmit Week 4 with pr

Resubmit Week 4 assignment with professor feedback addressed. 5 %

Unacceptable- Did not resubmit Week 4 assignment with professor feedback addressed./ Needs Improvement- Partially resubmitted Week 4 assignment with professor feedback addressed./ Competent- Satisfactorily resubmitted Week 4 assignment with professor feedback addressed. Exemplary- Thoroughly resubmitted Week 4 assignment with professor feedback addressed.

Resubmit Week 6 assignment with professor feedback addressed. 5 %

Unacceptable- Did not resubmit Week 6 assignment with professor feedback addressed./ Needs Improvement- Partially resubmitted Week 6 assignment with professor feedback addressed./ Competent- Satisfactorily resubmitted Week 6 assignment with professor feedback addressed. Exemplary- Thoroughly resubmitted Week 6 assignment with professor feedback addressed.

Resubmit Week 8 assignment with professor feedback addressed. 5 %

Unacceptable- Did not resubmit Week 8 assignment with professor feedback addressed./ Needs Improvement- Partially resubmitted Week 8 assignment with professor feedback addressed. /Competent- Satisfactorily resubmitted Week 8 assignment with professor feedback addressed. Exemplary -Thoroughly resubmitted Week 8 assignment with professor feedback addressed.

Recommend two strategies for sustaining change. Diagnose the two theories from a scholarly perspective. 10 %

Unacceptable- Did not submit two recommended strategies for sustaining change. Did not submit diagnoses of the two theories from a scholarly perspective./ Needs Improvement- Partially recommended two strategies for sustaining change. Partially diagnosed the two theories from a scholarly perspective./ Competent- Satisfactorily recommended two strategies for sustaining change. Satisfactorily diagnosed the two theories from a scholarly perspective. / Exemplary- Thoroughly recommended two strategies for sustaining change. Thoroughly diagnosed the two theories from a scholarly perspective.  

Recommend two strategies for sustaining change. Evaluate why the strategies selected are viable for the organization. 10 %

Unacceptable- Did not submit a 10–15 slide PowerPoint presentation to submit to executive leadership and board members outlining and describing your recommended change. Was not creative in design so that it is appealing to others. /Needs Improvement- Partially created a 10–15 slide PowerPoint presentation to submit to executive leadership and board members outlining and describing your recommended change. Was partially creative in design so that it is appealing to others./ Competent -Satisfactorily created a 10– 15 slide PowerPoint presentation to submit to executive leadership and board members outlining and describing your recommended change. Was satisfactorily creative in design so that it is appealing to others./ Exemplary- Thoroughly created a 10–15 slide PowerPoint presentation to submit to executive leadership and board members outlining and describing your recommended change. Was thoroughly creative in design so that it is appealing to others.

Ensure that all of the major points of the plan are covered in your PowerPoint presentation. 10 %

Unacceptable- Did not submit or incompletely ensured that all of the major points of the plan are covered./ Needs Improvement- Partially ensured that all of the major points of the plan are covered. Competent- Satisfactorily ensured that all of the major points of the plan are covered./ Exemplary -Thoroughly ensured that all of the major points of the plan are covered.